Spam Filter Inbound Rule

To the Ipswitch web site

Ipswitch Forums
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      



Spam Filter Inbound RuleExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 7/23/2004 4:32:25 PM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/26/2004 9:34:00 AM
Posts: 4, Visits: 1
I am using IMail 8.12 and I have a rule problem.
If I use the one and only single rule
S!~\s.*!AND!H~\sSubject\:\s!OR!H!~\sSubject\:\s:spam@appsci.com
Every single bit of email goes to spam@appsci.com

Can anyone tell me why and how to fix it?

Below is a log snippet...

Thanks!
Matthew Hanna

20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9001002866f4d) [68.15.48.149] connect 66.218.93.35 port 41934
20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9000d02846f4e) [68.15.48.149] connect 151.197.42.225 port 3590
20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9001002866f4d) [66.218.93.35] HELO web41202.mail.yahoo.com
20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9001002866f4d) [66.218.93.35] MAIL FROM:
20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9001002866f4d) [66.218.93.35] RCPT TO:
20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9001002866f4d) [66.218.93.35] M:\IMAIL\spool\D5df9001002866f4d.SMD 947
20040723 145033 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (5df9001002866f4d) performing antispam checks
20040723 145034 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5df9001002866f4d) processing M:\IMAIL\spool\Q5df9001002866f4d.SMD
20040723 145034 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5df9001002866f4d) Inbound X-IMail-Rule: S!~\s.*!AND!H~\sSubject\:\s!OR!H!~\sSubject\:\s:spam@appsci.com
20040723 145034 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5df9001002866f4d) ldeliver appsci.com spam-main (1) someone@yahoo.com 947
20040723 145034 127.0.0.1 SMTP (5df9001002866f4d) finished M:\IMAIL\spool\Q5df9001002866f4d.SMD status=1
Post #359
Posted 7/24/2004 1:56:36 AM
Time Traveler

Time TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime Traveler

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/15/2005 1:07:00 AM
Posts: 217, Visits: 1

Looks like you're expecting consistent grouping features in rules that aren't really there.  Trying to use ANDs and ORs in the same rule will lead to unexpected results.  They're designed to be used in separate rules ('x AND y AND z' or 'x OR y OR z,' but not 'x AND y OR z').

--Sandy

 

 



------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Remote Mailboxes into Aliases on your IMail MX!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/

Post #362
Posted 7/26/2004 9:27:19 AM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/26/2004 9:34:00 AM
Posts: 4, Visits: 1
Hmmm... Wildly inconvenient. Oh well!
Thanks for the advice. I will give it a try.

Matthew Hanna
Post #382
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.
Forum Moderators: Mark Singh, kevin r gillis, Jason Benton, Brandon Felger, Ben Henderson, Tripp Allen, Will Sansbury, Hush, FTPplanet.com, Hugh Garber, WUP-PM, Tom Lewis, mmulryan@ipswitch.com, mswimm, Brad Senter

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 7:35pm

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2008
Execution: 0.156. 9 queries. Compression Enabled.