SMTP Service listening on two ports

To the Ipswitch web site

Ipswitch Forums
Home      Members   Calendar   Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
      



SMTP Service listening on two portsExpand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 9/14/2004 5:41:14 PM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/13/2006 1:24:00 PM
Posts: 13, Visits: 1

What would be nice, but I am assuming nearly impossible, is to have the SMTP service listen on two ports. The list of ISP's stopping outbound port 25 is growing by leaps and bounds and has now extended to a major cable broadband provider. To give a user the option to send mail on a non-standard port would help without having to get the remaining thousands of users to change over to the non-standard port. Any suggestions?

I was thinking about doing a NAT rule on the firewall that sees a particular port bound for the mail server, say port 26, and converts it back to 25 and send it along to the mail server. I'm guessing that would solve the problem but it's a messy solution. I also don't want to try it in production.

Anyone got anything better in mind before I screw up one of my active networks?

 

Post #1415
Posted 9/15/2004 12:35:03 AM
Time Traveler

Time TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime TravelerTime Traveler

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 6/15/2005 1:07:00 AM
Posts: 217, Visits: 1

Indeed, you need to use either a software port redirector or a NAT rule.  I'd prefer the latter.

--Sandy



------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.

Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Remote Mailboxes into Aliases on your IMail MX!
  http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/

Post #1422
Posted 9/15/2004 9:58:39 AM
Junior Member

Junior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior MemberJunior Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 11/13/2006 1:24:00 PM
Posts: 13, Visits: 1

That's what I figured. Even it it doesn't work I don't see any negative impact on the firewall at all. At first I thought it was a bit messy but the more I think about it the cleaner it actually sounds because I don't have to touch my mail servers.

Thanks

Post #1436
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


Reading This TopicExpand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.
Forum Moderators: Dave, Mark Singh, kevin r gillis, Jason Benton, Brandon Felger, Ben Henderson, Tripp Allen, Jason Henline, Will Sansbury, Hush, FTPplanet.com, Hugh Garber, WUP-PM, Tom Lewis, mmulryan@ipswitch.com, mswimm, Brad Senter

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 9:37am

Powered By InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2008
Execution: 0.125. 8 queries. Compression Enabled.